Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence has moved from a specialised technical instrument into an everyday conversational presence. People now ask AI systems for moral advice, biblical interpretation, prayer, vocational guidance, emotional reassurance, and answers to questions of meaning. This article examines the transfer of spiritual authority through epistemic dependence, anthropomorphism, automation bias, moral agency, and Christian discernment. It argues that AI can assist theological study and ecclesial service but cannot bear spiritual authority in the proper Christian sense because it does not worship, repent, suffer, love, participate in a community, receive a vocation, or stand morally responsible before God. The article proposes a practical framework of accountable use: name the tool truthfully, distinguish assistance from testimony, verify consequential claims, preserve human responsibility, protect vulnerable users, disclose significant AI involvement, and submit interpretation to Scripture, communal wisdom, and the fruits of faithful life.
Full text & files
Original files hosted by Zenodo.
↓When_AI_Becomes_a_Spiritual_Authority_Daniel_J_Grace.docx↓When_AI_Becomes_a_Spiritual_Authority_Daniel_J_Grace.pdfCite this work
Grace, Daniel J. (2026). When Artificial Intelligence Becomes a Spiritual Authority: Christian Discernment in the Age of Algorithms. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22045036
Download citation (RIS) ↓Repository citation. For a formally published version, follow the citation and publication details provided by the original deposit.